Online Research Panel

Consumerfieldwork GmbH owns a proprietary online research panel (access panel), being actively managed since 2006. Our panel is solely used for research purposes. We firmly believe that the data quality is far superior compared to some international mass panels (for comparison and concrete details see box below).

Online Panels und Panel Quality

To ensure the high quality of our proprietary online research panel Consumer-Opinon.com and related services at all times, we set high standards for our own performance. Our internal standards:

  • Not exploiting of members, instead fair incentives and reliable payout - participants answer carefully in return
  • Just 1-2 invitations per month, thus we do not generate "survey professionals" due to over-testing
  • "Real" respondents, as identity is indirectly validated via bank account (because wire transfer is the only possible payout)
  • Automatic un-subscription of members non-active for 12 month - thus very high response rate
  • No "river sampling", no community, no direct marketing, no "survey router"
  • Usually no "sampling brokerage" - buying sample just on rare occasions and after customer's approval
  • All customers receive a special redirect to report bad quality - no payment of these cases needed
  • Systematic silent lockout from participants having a bad data history

Hereby we achieve high response rates (about 40%, and within some audiences over up to 50%) and deliver reliable results based on solid data quality.

Panelbook

We have panels in Germany and UK. Our panel books (=panel size and structure) can be found here:
Panelbook Germany
Panelbook UK

Reasons for highest panel quality

Why is the data quality in some panels so low?
Especially with some large international panels participants are flooded with multiple survey invitations every day. After a while, those participants become "survey professionals" with the special ability to "qualify" for each and every survey. They do so by answering the usual screening questions at the start of the surveys purely tactical, but not truthfully anymore. The result is, that within samples from some large international panels the participants do not really have the required target group attributes, but only pretend to have them.

In addition, the trend is that some panels exploit the participants: Incentives are only raffle tickets or just tiny credits of a few cents are granted in return for filling out half an hour long surveys. And in spite of that, collected amounts expire periodically before payout is possible. At some point members of those panels realize that they are exploited and the panel response drops. Remaining participants compensate by clicking through more surveys in shorter time. Obviously they can only do so by reading hastily or even stop reading the questions altogether and instead simply click some nice looking patterns. In fact those panels breed "survey professionals" answering screenings tactically and then bluntly click through main surveys as fast as they can without giving consideration to survey topics. The data quality that derives from commissioning those mass panels is in accordance to how they treat their respondents.

In order to maintain the data quality of our panel even within this environment, we do everything we can to set us apart from the trend and some mass panels.

Why is the data quality from our panel considerably higher?
The good panel response and the excellent quality of our panelists' answers are the result of a mix of sustainable care for our panelists and a rigorous quality control:

Sustainable panel care:
We work only with our own panel: No sample brokerage, no river sampling! We grant our panel members appropriate and fair compensation and reliable payout and motivate them to answer carefully and elaborately in return. Accumulated credits do not expire and are reliably paid out. Even participants who do not qualify receive a (smaller) incentive for their efforts. Our participants know us as a serious and fair online research panel and have a positive and trustful attitude towards us and the surveys we present them. Because we are a comparatively small panel provider, our participants are not flooded with daily survey invitations, instead receive just 1-2 invitations per month. This way we prevent breeding "survey professionals" (see above).

Surveillance:
Other than many competitors, we do not use PayPal or Amazon vouchers for payout. Instead the one and only way for our respondents to receive a payout is by way of a bank wire transfer to an existing bank account. Since opening a personal bank account requires an identity proof by a passport or identity card, multiple payouts to the same bank account become obvious and those respondents are blocked. Thus, our respondents are not "virtual", but instead are real persons with real bank accounts and verifiable identity. Moreover, by standard we provide all customers with really easy to use links in order to report us interviews with bad data quality. The advantage for the customers is that they do not need to pay those bad interviews. The advantage for us is that we can score respondents for quality, and we systematically block participants who caused bad quality interviews. in the long run only those participants remain with our panel, who constantly deliver fine quality data.

Taken together, the quality of our data is considerably higher than with a lot of other panels.

Stop using mass processing by large international panel giants and sometimes receiving sloppy data. Come to us and receive high quality panel services from an owner-operated reasonably sized fieldwork company from Germany that has been in the market for 10 years. Test it and send us an email with an RFQ: You receive a quick, friendly, honest and competent reply.

CONTACT

Consumerfieldwork GmbH
Panel Sampling & Internet Surveys
Singapurstr. 15
20457 Hamburg
Fon 040 / 740 41 98 - 0
Fax 040 / 740 41 98 - 1
info@consumerfieldwork.com